Design QA

Design QA

• Source visual truth: /workspace/scratch/6f6da254bc50/generated_images/exec-ddb407c3-86dd-49e0-8726-a83fa0d64939.png
• Implementation: browser-rendered http://terminal.local:4173/ (inline cloud-browser capture; the browser share directory was read-only, so no local screenshot file could be written)
• Comparison view: http://terminal.local:4173/qa.html
• Viewport: cloud browser 1365 × 927; comparison normalized to two 1440 × 1024 surfaces at 0.445 scale
• Source pixels: 1536 × 1024
• Implementation CSS target: 1440 × 1024 desktop
• State: English homepage, top of page, project rows collapsed

Findings

No actionable P0, P1 or P2 findings remain.

• Fonts and typography: DM Serif Display and Inter reproduce the source’s editorial serif/sans hierarchy. The English headline naturally wraps to two lines rather than the Turkish source’s three; hierarchy and optical weight remain equivalent.
• Spacing and layout rhythm: header, hero, CTA group, credibility line and selected-work boundary align closely with the source. Section width and density are consistent after the project-row correction.
• Colors and tokens: warm paper, ink navy, cobalt action color and light divider system match the selected direction with accessible contrast.
• Image quality and asset fidelity: the hero uses a dedicated raster dot-field asset generated for the design. No decorative asset was approximated with CSS, SVG or text glyphs. Material Symbols provides the interface icons.
• Copy and content: English-first positioning, enterprise proof, Ontario Cloud relationship and newsletter role reflect the approved content strategy. A localized Turkish version is available at /tr/.

Comparison history

1. Initial comparison found a P2 project-row density mismatch: descriptions were constrained beneath titles instead of using the wide third column shown in the source.
2. Fixed the project grid so title and description occupy distinct columns, then reloaded the browser implementation.
3. Post-fix side-by-side comparison shows matching row density, alignment and information hierarchy.

Primary interactions tested

• Primary CTA scrolls to the contact section and updates the URL fragment.
• Project disclosure button opens the additional detail and updates aria-expanded.
• Navigation anchors and external links are present in the browser DOM.
• Browser console checked. No application errors were present; only unrelated cloud-browser extension metadata errors appeared.

Focused comparison evidence

Hero typography, CTAs, credibility line and project rows were readable in the combined source/implementation comparison. A second crop was not needed after the project-row fix.

Residual test gaps / P3

• The cloud browser has a fixed desktop viewport, so the responsive CSS breakpoint was inspected in code but not captured as a separate mobile browser image.
• Final Jekyll rendering must be confirmed by GitHub Pages because Ruby is not installed in the local runtime.

final result: passed